{"id":23614,"date":"2023-12-01T09:22:45","date_gmt":"2023-12-01T09:22:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/factcheckni.org\/?p=23614"},"modified":"2023-12-01T09:27:13","modified_gmt":"2023-12-01T09:27:13","slug":"agri-food-policy-environmental-protections-and-plans-within-plans-within-plans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/factcheckni.org\/articles\/explainers\/agri-food-policy-environmental-protections-and-plans-within-plans-within-plans\/","title":{"rendered":"Agri-food policy, environmental protections and plans within plans within plans"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A single sentence in a newspaper unravels to reveal how strategic policy can be 1) like a Russian Doll, and 2) open to various interpretations of blame.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

On 13 October, an article in the Guardian<\/a> claimed that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAll five big parties \u2013 the DUP, Sinn F\u00e9in, Ulster Unionists, Alliance and the SDLP \u2013 signed off on the 2013 \u2018Going for Growth\u2019 strategy, which intensified farming and sent ever more slurry into Lough Neagh.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is a deceptively simple statement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rather than try to pin down its overall accuracy \u2013 which is trickier than it seems at first glance \u2013 instead we\u2019ll use this as a nice launching point for an examination of public policy and how it is crafted. Particularly when it comes to long-term, high-level strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Design, sign off, implementation: it sounds very basic. However, big strategies often contain plans within plans, and plans to make further plans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This muddies the waters around what decisions, made when, actually led to change on the ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ultimately, the statement in the Guardian makes two claims:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. All five of the largest parties signed off on Going for Growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. That strategy led to more slurry going into Lough Neagh.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first claim could be called accurate or inaccurate, depending on your perspective. The second is difficult to unpick.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The starting point is 2012, and the creation of something called the Agri-Food Strategy Board (AFSB).<\/p>\n\n\n\n