{"id":23460,"date":"2023-08-14T14:03:06","date_gmt":"2023-08-14T14:03:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/factcheckni.org\/?p=23460"},"modified":"2023-12-18T11:07:55","modified_gmt":"2023-12-18T11:07:55","slug":"relationships-and-sexuality-education-rse-in-northern-ireland-whats-happening","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/factcheckni.org\/articles\/relationships-and-sexuality-education-rse-in-northern-ireland-whats-happening\/","title":{"rendered":"Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE) in Northern Ireland: What\u2019s happening?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
A four-page leaflet <\/a>circulated by the lobby group Truth Behind RSE NI (TBRNI) makes multiple claims regarding Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE) in Northern Ireland. <\/p>\n\n\n\n We\u2019ve taken a look and found the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE) has been part of the Northern Ireland school curriculum since 2007. As well as conducting and moderating examinations, the Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment (CCEA) publishes resources to help teachers deliver the NI Curriculum. Its website describes RSE<\/a> as \u201ca lifelong process\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIt helps children and young people acquire knowledge, understanding and skills, and develop attitudes, beliefs and values about relationships, sexual identity, and intimacy. Effective RSE, which is taught in a sensitive and inclusive manner, encourages children and young people to value themselves as individuals and to make responsible and well-informed decisions about their lives.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n RSE is taught<\/a> through <\/a>Personal Development and Mutual Understanding in primary school (Foundation and Key Stages 1 and 2 covering ages 4-11) and Learning for Life and Work at secondary school (Key Stages 3 and 4, ages 11-16).<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Department of Education notes<\/a> that (at Key Stages 3 and 4) \u201cissues relating to RSE may also be taught through other subjects including religious education (ethics), biology (the body and reproduction) and history (assessment of the treatment of minorities in the past compared to now).\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The statutory curriculum includes a prescribed minimum content in relation to RSE. Schools have flexibility to decide on how best to deliver RSE to meet the needs of pupils within the context of each school\u2019s distinctive ethos (which can include the moral and religious principles held by parents and school management authorities).<\/p>\n\n\n\n All grant-aided schools must already develop and make available their own policy on how they will address Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE), consulting with parents and pupils, and endorsed by the Board of Governors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n On 6 June 2023, Secretary of State Chris Heaton-Harris announced <\/a>that the UK Government was updating the requirements for the Relationship and Sexuality Education (RSE) curriculum in Northern Ireland.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the Northern Ireland Office<\/a>, the changes were needed as \u201cthe Secretary of State is under a statutory duty under the Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Act 2019 to implement recommendation 86(d) of the Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination of Women (CEDAW)\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The NIO statement said that: \u201cthey will make age-appropriate, comprehensive and scientifically accurate education on sexual and reproductive health and rights, covering prevention of early pregnancy and access to abortion, a compulsory component of curriculum for adolescents\u201d and \u201cplace a duty on the Department of Education to issue guidance on the content and delivery of the education\u201d by 1 January 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As part of the Northern Ireland Executive, the Department of Education has devolved responsibility for the local curriculum. However, there is currently no Minister in place<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The Secretary of State made Regulations to amend the Education (Curriculum Minimum Content) Order 2007 (Northern Ireland) to add additional topics to the RSE curriculum at Key Stages 3 and 4 (ages 11-16).<\/p>\n\n\n\n In a letter to schools in June<\/a>, the Department acknowledged that while schools may already be addressing the topic of abortion in their RSE programme, \u201cthere is no expectation that you would do so ahead of the Guidance being issued by the Department accompanied by support materials later in the year\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The additions to the minimum RSE content will be taught no sooner than 1 January 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n CEDAW<\/a> is the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. Paragraph 86 (d) of the report recommended that the UK Government:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Make age-appropriate, comprehensive and scientifically accurate education on sexual and reproductive health and rights a compulsory component of curriculum for adolescents, covering prevention of early pregnancy and access to abortion, and monitor its implementation.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the paragraph that the Secretary of State\u2019s announcement word-for-word refers to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The claim is accurate that \u201cthe Secretary of State wants \u2026 abortion taught in the new school year of 2023\/2024 at secondary schools\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, there is nothing to suggest that abortion is being encouraged or promoted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Secretary of State (and the CEDAW recommendations) just require \u201cage-appropriate, comprehensive and scientifically accurate education on sexual and reproductive health and rights, covering prevention of early pregnancy and access to abortion\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And (see below) parents and carers will be able to withdraw their children from part or all lessons that cover \u201cprevention of early pregnancy and access to abortion\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Neither the Secretary of State\u2019s announcement nor the CEDAW report and its recommendations make any reference to what Truth About RSE NI refer to as \u2018transgenderism\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While the term \u2018transgenderism\u2019 is never used, the existing RSE curriculum already requires teaching on LGBTQ+ matters including the use of appropriate terminology and language and understanding the impact of homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Meeting CEDAW\u2019s 86 (d) recommendation does not require any change to the curriculum or guidance around sexuality. This part of the claim is not accurate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Does CCEA suggest that children are taught \u201chow to obtain sexual pleasure in various ways\u201d as claimed by TBRNI?<\/p>\n\n\n\n No.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The framework suggests within a section on healthy relationships that GCSE-aged pupils (14-16) should be able to \u201cdescribe pleasure, rights, empowerment, sexism and feminism\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A section on sexual behaviours for older students (post-16) suggests that they should be able to recognise that sex should be pleasurable and that some behaviours can be dangerous, be respectful of people\u2019s different desire about types of sexual behaviour\/intimacy, recognise that both male and female orgasms are a sensation of intense sexual pleasure, know the role of Viagra and why it may be needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While there is a statutory minimum set of content that must be taught, the method in which schools and teachers deliver the curriculum is not set in stone. CCEA provide a non-statutory RSE Progression Framework<\/a> (PDF<\/a>) that shows how different themes could be covered across different stages and ages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In a section claiming that UNESCO and the World Health Authority are \u201copenly promoting [the teaching] to young children [of] masturbation, pornography, sexual techniques, encouragement of minors to engage in same sex relationships\u201d, TBRNI\u2019s leaflet describes the UNESCO\u2019s International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education<\/a>, as \u201cthe official guideline for all public schools around the world.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n This mischaracterises the document which explains in its foreword that the \u201cguidance enables national authorities to design comprehensive curricula that will have a positive impact on young people\u2019s health and well-being\u201d. The foreword adds that the guidance \u201cis voluntary, based on the latest scientific evidence, and designed to support countries to implement effective sexuality education programmes adapted to their contexts\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n CCEA says that the themes are \u201caligned\u201d to international evidence-based frameworks like UNESCO\u2019s though it is clear from reading the CCEA framework that it goes into much less detail (54 pages) than the much larger UNESCO document (139 pages).<\/p>\n\n\n\n The whole of page three of TBRNI\u2019s leaflet is devoted to a description of the World Health Authority\u2019s Standards for Sexuality Education<\/a>. <\/a>TBRNI describe the WHO document as an example of a \u201cdriving force behind RSE\u201d. However, it is not referenced<\/strong> in any support material on the CCEA RSE website.<\/p>\n\n\n\n TBRNI also claim that \u201cironically, relationships and sexuality education programs fail to teach children about all of the emotional, psychological and physical health risks of promiscuous sexual activity.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n This misrepresents the evidence on the CCEA RSE hub and the non-statutory RSE progression framework.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There are regular references to being self-aware of feelings and emotions, and ways to improve emotional wellbeing. Regarding physical health risks of multiple sexual partners, a Key Stage 4 unit<\/a> specifically suggests \u201climiting your number of sexual partners\u201d as a way of preventing Sexually Transmitted Infections and to \u201cavoid overlapping relationships\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n CCEA\u2019s RSE Guidance for Parents and Boards of Governors<\/a> explains that while there is currently no legislative provision permitting parental withdrawal from sex education, schools can grant requests from parents and carers on an individual basis. Announcing the changes in a written statement to the House of Commons, <\/a>the Secretary of State, acknowledged this \u201cmechanism\u201d with regard to the new curriculum aspects on abortion.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to queries from FactCheckNI, a representative from the Department of Education (DoE) stated:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe Department is required to make and lay regulations to provide for a parent to have their child excused from classes providing age-appropriate and scientifically accurate education on sexual and reproductive health and rights covering prevention of early pregnancy and access to abortion.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the Department of Education, officials have already commenced work on a full public consultation to inform how RSE is extended in Northern Ireland. At the time of publishing this fact check, the consultation has not yet been launched.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A four-page leaflet circulated by the lobby group Truth Behind RSE NI (TBRNI) makes multiple claims regarding Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE) in Northern Ireland. We\u2019ve taken a look and found the following: Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE) has been part of the Northern Ireland school curriculum since 2007. As well as conducting and moderating…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":21489,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,26,30],"tags":[336,335,323],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n