depending on what goods are moving across a border.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nMr McMahon\u2019s statement does not<\/strong> say that 20% of all EU checks take place in the Irish Sea. He says that, based on a calculation, 20% of documentary SPS checks take place in NI – i.e. that one fifth of a certain subcategory of a certain type of check take place here.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhen asked to provide details of how this calculation was made, a DAERA spokesperson said: \u201cThe AERA Committee was advised that from Jan-March 2021, evidence received from the EU TRACES database indicated that the volume of checks for products of animal origin at NI POE constituted approx 20% of the EU total.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
European Commission<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\nWhen the DUP\u2019s claim was put to the European Commission (EC), they said they were unable to categorically confirm or deny the statement, saying that, \u201cOur UK partners have not provided us with any information on this matter but we are aware that different statistics have been cited in the media.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The EC spokesperson continued: \u201cOn average, the consignments entering Northern Ireland from Great Britain tend to be smaller in size and more varied than consignments entering the EU from other third countries. While these goods may be electronically tracked, it does not mean that physical checks and controls are taking place on each and every one of these products. It\u2019s simply a reflection of the movement of goods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cFrom our SPS statistics (TRACES system), we can see that Rotterdam performs 33% of physical checks on food products of animal origin, while Belfast only performs 2% and Larne 1.5%. From this point of view, official controls at Rotterdam are definitely more numerous, and more in line with the minimum frequency rates for physical checks laid down in EU legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cIn October 2021, the Commission proposed bespoke arrangements to respond to the difficulties that people in Northern Ireland have been experiencing because of Brexit, by further facilitating the movement of goods from Great Britain to Northern Ireland. The Commission\u2019s proposals would result in approximately an 80% reduction of official SPS checks and a 50% reduction in customs-related paperwork, while protecting the integrity of the EU\u2019s Single Market.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The EC also pointed out: \u201cThis is however an extremely complex area, which makes it very difficult to compare official controls, as these depend on the type of goods and their marketing stage.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Difference between DAERA and European Commission figures? <\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe European Commission\u2019s response suggesting that only 3.5% of checks take place in the Irish Sea is not actually contradictory with DAERA position, because they are talking about different categories of check.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The EC figures are based on physical SPS <\/strong>checks, whereas the DAERA statement is based on the documentary SPS<\/strong> checks.<\/p>\n\n\n\nBased on all this evidence, the DUP\u2019s claim is unsubstantiated. It is possible that further published information could confirm or deny their claim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It is unclear how this figure was calculated. Neither the DUP, DAERA nor the European Commission could confirm the figure. On 14 January 2022, the DUP published a document, \u201c7 reasons the Irish Sea border must go\u201d highlighting \u201cthe impact of the Protocol on Northern Ireland and the wider United Kingdom\u201d. One of the claims…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":22823,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,27,29],"tags":[45,290],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Do 20% of EU customs checks take place in the Irish Sea? - FactCheckNI<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n